Catalyst Phase →

groforgood-logo-webTHE BIG IDEA

Groundwater is essential for economic growth and can contribute to human development if resources are used sustainably to benefit the poor. New approaches need to be found to balances growth and development goals.

RESEARCH AIM / HYPOTHESIS

To develop Groundwater Risk Management Tool that will help government and groundwater users balance the demands of human development and better health, economic growth and groundwater sustainability so that the poorest benefit.

STUDY DESCRIPTION

Africa’s groundwater systems are a critical but poorly understood socio-ecological system. Central to accelerating and sustaining Africa’s development is improved understanding of groundwater risks and institutional responses to competing growth and development goals is needed. Explosive urban growth, irrigated agricultural expansion, industrial pollution, untapped mineral wealth, rural neglect and environmental risks converge to increase the complexity and urgency of groundwater governance across Africa.

The research will focus on tackling the following questions:

  1. How can risks to groundwater quality and quantity for drinking water security be identified and reduced?
  2. How can groundwater governance be designed to balance growth and development?
  3. What are the most significant and uncertain future scenarios affecting sustainable groundwater use for the poor?

The study will focus on the Kwale County area of South East Kenya where the poverty rate is high (7th most deprived out of 47 Counties in Kenya) and there is intensive use of groundwater for urban water supply, sugar cane irrigation and mining. Tackling the three questions above will involve detailed data collection, including the use of innovative ‘Smart Handpumps’ developed by University of Oxford that measure handpump use. The research brings together rigorous analysis and modelling of environmental, social, economic and governance systems and processes. A risk management tool will be developed and then tested. While sensitive to context of Kwale, the Groundwater Risk Management Tool will be designed to be flexible so that it can be scaled-up across Kenya and can be adapted to other countries and contexts.

RESEARCH ORGANISATIONS

RESEARCH TEAM

OU: Dr Robert Hope (PI), Dr Katrina Charles, Dr David Clifton, Dr Caitlin McElroy, Patrick Thomson, Jacob Katuva, Johanna Koehler, Farah Colchester, Prof David Bradley, Heloise Greeff ,  Dr. Achut Manandhar, Saskia Nowicki, Nancy Gladstone
JKUAT: Prof Bancy Mati, Prof John Gathenya.
UoN: Prof Daniel Olago, Julius Odida
UPC: Dr Albert Folch, Dr Daniel Fernàndez-Garcia, Dr Xavier, Sanchez-Vila, Prof Emilio Custodio, Prof Jesus Carrera, Núria Ferrer Ramos
RFL: Michael Thomas, Mike Lane

WORKING IN:

  • Kenya

PUBLICATIONS

Presentations from UPGro and related research

Related non-UPGro

12 thoughts on “Gro for GooD: Groundwater Risk Management for Growth and Development

  1. We see a good range of studies, which is excellent. Though I am still missing the primary issue, which is what are the REAL long-term average costs for the users while using these handpumps. The focus is now on technology, monitoring, and institutional settings, but most of our studies and experiences show that at the end of the day, there are only two deciding factors for sustainability, which are:

    (1) average yearly cost per family and
    (2) average breakdowns per year per pump.

    As long as policymakers do not have any idea about these figures, it is impossible to make right decisions on how to improve Community Water Supply and to achieve the SDGs.

    The trap is that the donor community may be just fooling itself with excellent reports, while not realizing that most if not all of these results have been made with substantial (hidden) subsidies, which is of course not sustainable. You even don’t know how much subsidies went in. Even worse, the REAL cost is therefore not exposed, which makes planning even more difficult.

    Paul van Beers
    BluePump.com

  2. Hi Paul,

    Thanks for your comments. In Kwale, water committee records suggest a typical community spends between $150-200 per year on O&M (all handpumps in Kwale are Afridevs). About $100-$150 per year is spent on repairs, with most of the remainder covering the pump attendant’s wage. The average household pays $7.20 per year (if they pay on a monthly basis), or equivalent to $1.30 per cubic meter if they pay per bucket. Based on self-reported data, the handpumps break down 2-3 times per year. You can see a detailed analyses of revenues and expenditures for water committees in Kwale here: https://goo.gl/Tb6Bxu

    Hope that helps!
    Tim Foster

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s